Artificial Blood Trials Kill 30% More People - And the FDA Intends to Do More Tests

If you have been in an accident during the last ten- Hemopure, manufactured by Biopure Corporation
years, you could have been a guinea pig for a- Hemospan, Sangart Inc.
medical product without even being told--and theThe authors noted that requests for more detailed
FDA approved it. The products are artificial blood,unpublished data of trials done by Northfield
several types produced by different pharmaceuticalLaboratories, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, and
corporations. Perfectly good human blood could haveBioPharma were refused. They were referred to
been available, but you would have been given thepress releases. Though other data was available for
artificial stuff.Northfield's PolyHeme, the authors were unable to
Making matters worse, the results of the studieslocate results from trials by Baxter, which produced
were abysmal. The number of deaths increased byOptro, or BioPharma, which produced Hemolink.
30% and heart attacks nearly tripled. According to(Another trial's results were available, which is why
Charles Natanson, a researcher with the NationalHemolink is included in the list above.)
Institutes of Health and the lead author of the study,These companies' hiding of their results, along with
"There have been no meaningful beneficial effectsthe FDA's tacit agreement of this practice--indeed,
reported in any trial."the FDA's own hiding of such information - is
So what is the FDA's response to these results?indicative of a culture of deceit in the entire
They plan to do more trials! They're saying that thepharmaceutical and so-called regulation business.
studies were "too broad" and that new studiesThe number of deaths in patients who received
should focus only on patients who are expected toartificial blood was 164, compared with 123 in those
die.who didn't receive it. Among those who were given
That means that the weakest, most severely injuredartificial blood, there were 59 myocardial infarctions,
patients will be the only ones placed at increased riskas opposed to 16 among those who didn't get it.
of death and heart attack.In a finding that conflicts with the FDA's intent to
A product that kills 30% more people and causescontinue testing on people at extreme risk of death,
three times more heart attacks than the naturalthe report states that there was no difference in
alternative, blood, has produced no benefit. And theresults for any subgroup. In other words, there is no
response of the FDA is to do more trials! The onlyreason to suspect that people who are expected to
difference is that the guinea pigs are expected todie will respond any better to artificial blood than
die, rather than simply being in great need of a bloodthose who stand a reasonable chance of living. Thus,
transfusion, as in the first sixteen trials.the FDA's plans to do more tests are entirely
The sloppiness of the FDA and its penchant for hidingunjustifiable.
information from the public is also demonstrated inThe authors also point out that the results of the
these studies. There doesn't seem to have been anytests were not made available to anyone who might
coordination of these studies and no comparisonshave been able to use them. They was not provided
between them were made.to scientists, doctors, institutional review boards,
The organization Public Citizen became concerned andcompeting manufacturers, or the public.
sued to get data. As a result, National Institutes ofA statement particularly incriminating of the FDA is:
Health (NIH) researcher Charles Natanson, MD, and"The most recent PolyHeme trial requires special
others took a look at information from the studies,mention for 2 reasons. First, the FDA gave approval
which were done between 1998 and 2007, a span offor this trial in trauma patients even though the FDA
ten years. That's ten years during which more andpresumably had unpublished data showing a significant
more people were placed at risk after each precedingincrease in MIs [myocardial infarctions] in the prior
study had shown no benefit and increased risk ofPolyHeme trial in vascular surgery patients; the FDA
death.had the results from trials involving other HBBS
According to Natanson, the FDA should have beenproducts also showing harm; and the FDA had placed
aware of the risks by 2000. Instead, they dida clinical hold on a Hemopure trauma trial because of
another five trials. Another 714 patients wereserious adverse events in previous, mostly
subjected to risks.unpublished, trials of this HBBS [hemoglobin-based
Findings from previous studies were not disclosed toblood substitutes, that is, artificial blood]."
hospitals considering doing trials. Jay S. Epstein, who isThe FDA allowed a second trial of a product,
the director of the Office of Blood Research andPolyHeme, in spite of the fact that the first trial had
Review, a division of the FDA, said that studies wereshown an increase in heart attacks and they knew
approved only when the potential benefitsthat other similar products had the same results.
outweighed the risks. On what basis the potentialFurther, the FDA had previously stopped a trial of
benefits were determined was unstated.another equivalent product because of adverse
The FDA Trialsoutcomes.
The Journal of the American Medical AssociationFDA's Lack of Oversight
printed Natanson's study in April 2008. It documentsClearly, blind trust in pharmaceutical companies is
the deaths and heart attacks caused by artificialdangerously misplaced. After all, the purpose of a
blood in these FDA-approved tests. It states thecorporation is profit. Anything else is merely a means
likely reason for these products' toxicity. Theyfor achieving that end. Thus, it isn't surprising that,
contain hemoglobin molecules that reside outside redgiven the opportunity, pharmaceutical manufacturers
cell membranes. Normally, hemoglobin exists onlymisrepresent and hide the results of drug trials.
inside the red cells. As a result, they bind with nitricHowever, the agency that is supposed to be the
acid quickly, resulting in systemic vasoconstriction andwatchdog over pharmaceutical corporations is now
platelets being made inactive. Vasoconstriction,nothing more than a shill for them. As seen in artificial
decreased blood flow, and other effects lead toblood trials, the FDA now actively promotes trials for
thrombosis - heart attacks.products that have already been shown to have no
Artificial blood products tested:benefit and cause death. They hide the results of
- PolyHeme, manufactured by Northfield Laboratories,those trials. They allow testing without informed
Inc.consent of the victims.
- HemAssist, manufactured by Baxter HealthcareIn short, the FDA acts as shields and shills for
Corporationpharmaceutical firms.
- Hemolink, manufactured by Hemosol BioPharma, Inc.