Should Criminal Trials Have a Lay Jury?

The whole question as to whether criminal trialsBut how can a jury of normal human beings decide
should be decided upon via a layman jury has comeon a case which is filled with such complexity and
to the fore once again. A case in the U.K. where awhich, in addition, could only be descriptively analyzed
young boy died with five times the normal levels ofand contested by advanced medical brains? This begs
salt in his blood has highlighted a difficult problem.the question as to whether juries should be made up
The two adults who were attempting to adopt himof expert observers but less, in turn, will it raise the
were accused of manslaughter and, basically, of forcedifficulty in actually getting experts on a regular
feeding him salt. They won an appeal in the Britishenough basis to sit through lengthy complex trials.
courts which was presided over by a judge and aThe other alternative is to have juries sitting and
jury.deciding on the outcome of a case but with access
However, the case revolved around the possibilityto a "friend" in the guise of an expert witness chosen
that this young boy who died suffered from a rareor agreed by both prosecution and defense. Whilst
and complex medical condition and the case wasthis might be useful and advisory in complex cases,
argued for and against via the use of expert medicalfor instance complex fraud cases, it is far from ideal
witnesses who attempted to provide an up-to-dateand brings its own difficulties and assumptions.
record of current evidence, research, and knowledge.