Weight Loss and Artificial Sweeteners - Artificial Sweeteners Are Safe - Part 1

Artificial sweeteners including aspartame,cans of soda to day to as much as 11 cans a day
sucralose(splenda) & Truvia are safe for children,(the average was 2 cans per day or about 7% of
teens and adults. Every regulatory agency, scientificthe ADI).Even at this high level of intake there was
body, and peer reviewed medical studies haveno increase risk of cancer or any other medical
confirmed again and again that these sweeteners doproblems.
not cause cancer, nervous system diseases, celluliteDr George Blackburn, a noted Harvard researcher
or any other medical problem.made it clear, "Man is not a rat." In one of the
People really like the taste of sugar, we are bornlongest and largest study, Dr Blackurn found not only
with the desire and it only seems to increase as weno complications, but signficiant weight loss in dieters
age. Diabetic and individuals seeking to preventdrinking AS.
weight related medical complications have switchedAnd finally here is the expert committee report from
to consuming more and more artificial sweetenersthe American Cancer Society Guidelines(2007)
(AS) not only in soft drinks but in almost every food"Does aspartame cause cancer? No...Current evidence
possible. Yet the issue of safety and even efficacydoes not demonstrate any link between aspartame
still sparks controversy.ingestion and risk of cancer." In Italy, from the
In 1977 4.8% of the population used AS's daily, it hasEuropean Society for Medical Oncology
quadrupled to more than 15% today. Still not has high(2007): "The present work indicates a lack of
as one might assume given their popularity. Duringassociation between saccharin, aspartame and other
the same period the number of overweight childrensweeteners and the risk of several common
has exploded from 5% to 34% and the adults fromneoplasms."
44 to 67%.Aspartame and multiple sclerosis, seizures, chronic
The safety and efficacy of artificial sweeteners forfatigue, visual disturbances-
weight control has been the subject of continuedNo Relation: Again all of these reports are based on
controversy in the press and all over the Internet.anecdotal stories. No reliable reports have proven any
Numerous health problems have been blamed on theconnection between aspartame and these disorders.
use of AS ranging from multiple sclerosis, cellulite toSurprisingly, the answers are much simpler than one
cancer and kidney stones. When the FDA and thewould think: Of the two issues, safety and efficacy,
National Cancer Institute and such consumerthe safety is has been settled by all reasonable
organizations as Center for Science in the Publicindividuals: AS's are safe.
Interest settle one issue, another arises. Who shouldAspartame does carry a cautionary note, however. It
the consumer believe and what should he do? Shouldisn't safe for people who have the rare hereditary
the consumer avoid artificial sweeteners because ofdisease phenylketonuria (PKU). Products that contain
fear of cancer only to get diabetes, heart diseaseaspartame must carry a PKU warning on the label.
and other obesity related problems?There are published safety standards for
It's hard to know who to believe because there areconsumption of AS. The term ADI(Acceptable Daily
some many voices. Safety issues long ago settled byIntake) is used. by the FDA, the Joint Commission of
the regulatory agencies are brought up byExperts on Food Additives of the World Health
anti-artificial activists who spend a great degree ofOrganization, the Food and Agriculture Organization,
effort alerting the public as to what they perceive asthe European Food Safety Agency. In general the
the dangers of AS. Most are hypothetical questionsADI's include about 20 cans (12 oz.) per day of diet
totally lacking scientific evidence. While they claim tocola for aspartame, 12 packets of saccharin
be unbiased and "independent" they simply are notsweetener and 6 cans of diet cola for sucralose. Here
qualified to be able to scientifically evaluate theare some of the issues on the use of artificial
numerous safety evaluations, complex toxicologicalsweeteners and the generally accepted conclusions
studies and expert committee reports. Instead ofregarding their safety
using peer reviewed medical reports their conclusionsHere are the position papers of the major academic
are based on personal experience and anecdotalinstitutions involved in the safety issue of artificial
stories. As in all life sciences false positives and falsesweeteners:
negatives are a fact of life and expertise is required"Present levels of aspartame consumption appear to
to properly interpret data from such studies.be safe for those who do not have PKU.... The blood
Over-simplistic interpretations lead to incorrectphenylalanine levels reported in response to loading
conclusions.doses of aspartame in normal adults and those
What is the consumer to do in this situation? Likeheterozygous for the PKU gene do not seem to be
any issue, the consumer needs to seek out the mostsufficiently high to warrant concern of toxicity to the
trusted, experienced and educated experts he canindividual or even duringpregnancy." American
find. This is not difficult since there are literally aAcademy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition, Task
mountain of reliable scientific studies, some old andForce on the Dietary Management of Metabolic
some very recent.Disorders, December 1985 Final Report
Here are the issues to answer:"The American Diabetes Association finds the use of
1. Based on the most reliable, scientifically proventhe two commercially available non-caloric sweeteners
studies are artificial sweeteners safe?saccharin and aspartame to be acceptable. The use
2. Do artificial sweeteners help people lose weightof both sweeteners is encouraged for the particular
and prevent the complications of obesity?advantages of each." Position statement of the
To answer these questions I have relied on the bestAmerican Diabetes Association, "Use of No caloric
scientific studies I was able to find over the past 20Sweeteners," 1990
years. Here are the guidelines I have used to"Evidence indicates that long-term consumption of
evaluate the data.aspartame is safe and is not associated with any
1. Only scientific studies written by MD's or PhD fromadverse health effects." American Dietetic
recognized university medical centers are evenAssociation "Use of Nutritive and Nonnutritive
considered.Sweeteners" position statement, July 1993
2. The scientific evidence had to be presented in a"Available evidence suggests that consumption of
scientific, recognized, peer reviewed medical journal,aspartame by normal humans is safe and is not
containing not only the qualifications of the authors,associated with serious adverse health effects."
the location of the studies, pertinent medicalAmerican Medical Association Council on Scientific
references as well as any disclosures of conflict ofAffairs report, published in The Journal of the
interests of the authors.American Medical Association, July 19, 1985
3. Evidence from regulatory agencies both US andThe finest scientists from all over the world have
European, and position papers from expertagreed that artificial sweeteners used in moderation
committees of scientific associations.are safe for adults, children, pregnant women and
Aspartame and Headaches: No Cause and Effecteven lactating women.
Randomized, double blind controlled studies inThe regulatory agencies across the world as do all of
individuals who were convinced that aspartamethe professional societies have reached a similar
caused their headaches done in a clinical researchconclusion: substituting artificial sweetened beverages
center failed to show that aspartame producedand foods for naturally sweetened ones, especially
headaches. Numerous long terms, high dosethe juices and sodas, can lead to a significant
aspartame studies showed no evidence of headachesreduction in calories for those on calorie-reduced diets
from aspartame.but who still crave sweets.
Aspartame and Cancer: NO Cause and no EffectHowever, adding more calories because the sugar
Researchers examined the relationship betweencalories are reduced defeats the whole purpose.
aspartame and lymphoma, leukemia, and malignantThe debate about the safety and efficacy of artificial
brain cancers and found no increase rate of anysweeteners will most likely continue for years until
malignancy due to consumption of artificialmore conclusive studies come up with a definitive
sweeteners in animals or humans. After an Italiananswer. In the meantime, artificial sweeteners can be
report of increased cancer in rats fed large doses offound in everything from cookies to ice cream to
AS, the FDA and the European Food Safetysodas.
Authority (EFSA) re-examined all of the human andAnybody who wants to avoid foods containing
animal evidence again and confirmed the safety ofaspartame can identify its presence from the label.
AS and rejected the need for further studies. TheConsumers can make informed choices because food
National Cancer Institute examined human data frommanufacturers are required to list food additives and
the NIH Diet and Health Study of over half a millionother ingredients, including sweeteners, on labels.
retirees which included participants drinking from 1-2